Millipede 'One nation again'

What Millipede is proposing is that everyone having the same opportunities as the rest, good idea, but who will pay for this utopia? Yes more Liebore spin leading to another Liebore lie and as you know Liebore twist in the wind!
Everything has costs attached to it. Those who work and pay taxes are the ones who foot the bills. There are always some who don't succeed  either from lack of education, illness, no job, no prospects and economic climate we are seeing now. What we he should be promoting is education for those who lack it, job training for those out of work, and instilling personal responsibility into all.
For far to long the state as been seen to be the benefactor of all, who pays others for doing nothing, while those who graft take home less. It as to stop if this nation is to survive. We do have to have 'one nation' but not has Millipede see's it we have to have 'one nation' who are not afraid of work, not afraid of hard graft, and who are prepared to be thrifty and nifty to survive.

If Britain needs 'rebuilding' just who tore it down, Ed?

Fellow readers, understand where we are; the nation now consists of multiple lobby groups. If you do not belong to one of these,the chances are you will receive no benefit from their actions. If you do,it is purely by chance. Sadly the lobby which infests Parliament purports to represent the electorate. In fact, they continually lobby for themselves. Read Millipedes droning again. he is merely talking to his fellow lobbyists. The media,including this refuge for inadequate journalism , are no more than another part of this lobby group. Millipede and co have secured their situation by representing the same views but presented in slightly different ways. Voter disengagement matters not to them -after all they will get the votes of various lobby groups to give them power.
He is a prat. End of. And one prat that I would love to see ride this pathetically small wave of pseudo-popularity all the way to May 2015, or, I hope, earlier, so that when the time comes to bite the bullet and really show your support, he loses by a landslide of proportions that the Mythological Greeks would be proud of.
You and I are of no consequence. Any presentation of 'change' or 'caring about the nation' is just a smokescreen.Typical socialist hypocrisy - One Nation in one breath and bad old-fashioned class war in the next.

Millipede, yawn, yawn, yawn

State school, public school - yawn, yawn, yawn! Ed Milliband represents all that is wrong with politics. Boring and bland - lacking presence and not saying anything new. And just like all the other shallow charmless fools, they all take advice from the unseen advisers and sycophants - What colour shirt? Single button cuffs? Dark suit? Plain dark tie? Yep - that was his attire. Ed Miliband has nothing in common with me. Let's start with the fact that he's never had a proper job outside the shielded walls of the Labour Party. And as a regular hard working bloke I'm also trying to understand how he can mortgage that million pound house he has in Primrose Hill on an MP's wages. And of course I didn't play any part at all in the last Labour Government's spending plans which doubled structural Government in just seven years and has left our country with a financial albatross on it's back just when we need to make some savings. Finally, I can answer a straightforward question without spending 6 minutes talking irrelevant and If this dull, uninspiring man thinks he can persuade us that he can both buck the entire world economic recession and 'turn Britain around', and make us all a one-nation of altruistic saints, he's dreaming. incomprehensible bollocks like he seems to every time he's on the Marr show.

Lets get ready for the great "Balls" up.

"Balls"

It is a sure fire sign the cretin has finally lost it!.
It was largely the property market that got us into the mess in the first place and nothing has change to make me think it will be any different the second time around.

Usual Labour rubbish. As long as there is no distinction drawn between velocity of money and actual wealth - and they are completely different things - then anything said on the subject by any of the two-and-a-half main parties can be completely disregarded as useless and irrelevant. 

Labour is the party of feckless  tax borrow and spend.   It is financially incompetent as it has amply demonstrated by taking the UK from a surplus in 1997 when they won power  to the edge of bankruptcy by 2010. 

Labour loaded up our children and grandchildren with massive debts so they could continue their borrowing based spending spree. The UK faces ageing demographics so a declining workforce has to carry an increasing retired population  with massive unfunded liabilities. How responsible is it to add debt to these future workers?

Labour policy was to have the public borrowing massively to maintain the consumer economy and hence keep themselves in power.  This policy has lead to the UK being only second in the world to Japan for total debt.

Labour as a party is extremely keen to reduce civil rights of the public at any opportunity.

Labour doubled spending on the public sector without any extra income to pay for it - incompetence on steroids!

It is estimated gross government national debt will could rise close to
100% of GDP by 2015. It is way above the government’s sustainable
investment rule of 40% maximum...

The only way the UK come escape bankruptcy is for the private sector to do extremely well in terms of growth to generate the income to pay off the debt. As a left wing party Labour has zero interest in the private sector which it considers to be almost criminal (as does the left wing EU).

Labour has lost virtually all private sector backing which shows the private sector thinks that Labour today  is anti-business rather than pro-business. There is no way Labour can offer regeneration of the private sector as it barely approves of making money.

Unless by some miracle the UK has serious private sector growth in the next few years the UK is going over a fiscal cliff courtesy of the push in the back from New Labour policies.  

The AAA rating will be lost without growth and debt payments rise. The printing of money has to result in inflation and devaluation of the  currency.

Abdelbaset Al Megrahi and the Labour (Liebore) years.

This man was found guilty in a proper court of law on neutral ground and subsequently lost two appeals. If such procedures are good enough for you and I and are generally accepted as fundamentally reliable why do those who think he is still innocent not bring forth the evidence of his innocence. I realise that some of the victims families may even think he was innocent but being a victims family member does not give their view any more weight or authority than the judges who found him guilty. Victims families aside, sadly there are always deluded fools who cry cover up and conspiracy and worse still those only too glad to see evil go unpunished. I feel that no one should suffer undue illness even guilty parties, but he should have remained in prison and been treated in there. As for his release, I think that (Bliar) Blair,Straw and the Scottish government were on the one hand naïve in letting him go given the propaganda coup the Gaddafi regime made of it, but acted less for compassionate grounds than to be able to thumb its nose at the USA and Great Britain. If any investigation should be made it should be into the Gaddafi and Blair (Bliar) meeting in the desert in March 2004 and to think that (Bliar) Blair wants to come back into British politics makes me feel sick to the core.

Now another "tosser" leaves a sinking labore ship.

Peter Hain was the man who flew off to a meeting of European ministers with the sole purpose of getting the word 'Federal' taken out of the Lisbon Treaty. He then made the claim on the BBC that there was no risk to British Sovereignty.

Now we have the situation where our elected Government has to beg on its knees to an unelected ECHR in order to deport people who are a risk to our lives.

Peter Hain is also the man who attempted to hand away Gibralter along with Tony Blair.

Peter Hain like the unprincipled opportunist Kinnock never had a proper job and is certainly up their with the slimiest of the labour stooges like Mandelson, Straw, Harperson etc.

The man is yet another Traitor who should swing by the neck and the sooner the better.

Impartial BBC with the Millipede and Harperson what a load of tossers!

The BBC, Associated Newspapers,Guardian Media Group who all opposed News Corp buying the remaining shares in BSkyB it didn't own. All coverage by these bodies is slewed to their points of view and priorities. This is a disservice to the man on the street who have no axes to grind or grievance to air. The Inquiry has descended into the trial of NewsCorp on the charge that the the Sun is not the same as the Guardian.
"Mrs Brooks scored a direct hit on Robert Jay QC when she pointed out that his questioning focused on precisely the sort of prurient gossip for which the Inquiry is tut-tutting about tabloid papers."

But the BBC didn't report that. They reported instead that Mrs Brooks was being quizzed on the "unhealthy" relationship between the government and Newscorp. The years 1997-2010 have apparently disappeared without trace and we seem to have had Cameron as PM for 15 years. I carry no torch for Cameron but this inquiry and its allied BBC coverage is getting preposterous. But brace yourselves, the BBC will grow more brazen, will serve grosser distortions, blatantly hide the truth for there’s now nobody left powerful enough to amount a challenge to the tossers along with Millipede and Harperson.